![]() |
||
|
CONSUMER BLOGROLL Consumer Protection Media, Democracy, Law & Culture |
U.S. PIRG Consumer Blog July 24, 2008:
Yesterday we released a new report: Total Recall: The Need for CPSC Reform Now. The report's key finding: Recalls are up 22% in 2008, despite the toy industry's claims they've cleaned up the worldwide mess they made just last year. Meanwhile, 50 members of the House, led by Rules Chair Louise Slaughter and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), sent conferees a strong new letter urging swift action to finish action on CPSC reform before the August recess. (Note: The current total is 50 signers, although this original letter had 37.) While 95% of the conference is done, the Senate awaits an offer from the House on critical issues including the Senate bill's phthalate ban (we're for it and Exxon Mobil's against it) and the Senate bill's requirement that all toy hazards be subjected to the new third party testing requirements in both bills (we're for it). Yet, some House conferees are siding with the toy industry, which is demanding that a new provision (in neither bill now) be added that permanently preempts states from auditing or reviewing that new, untested third party testing requirement, or requiring new tests as new hazards arise. We are against that. These and other remaining conference issues, such as why whistleblower protection will improve product safety, are discussed in the report. Links to ExxonMobil lobby reports listing their phthalate lobbying efforts are after the "continue reading" jump: Continue
reading "PIRG, coalition release: Total Recall: The Need for CPSC Reform Now" Posted by Ed Mierzwinski
at 10:06 AM
| Comments
(0)
Our colleagues at Consumer Action have released their annual credit card survey. From the release: Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 09:27 AM | Comments (0) July 22, 2008:
You can see the ad, and if you like it, help defray its cost, by logging on here. ExxonMobil makes phthalates, the toxic chemicals that are endocrine disruptors linked to developmental disorders. The Senate version of the CPSC Reform Act would ban phthalates in children's products and toys to limit this risk. The House has so far refused to take the provision. The toy industry is insisting on adding a new harmful layer of preemption to the CPSC Reform Act's (both House and Senate) centerpiece requirement that all toys undergo independent third party testing. It is always a mistake to preempt the right of the states to solve consumer or environmental problems. Some mistakes are bigger than others, though. When you have a new, untested federal law provision -- such as third party testing -- that may not work and may not completely solve the problem addressed by Congress, it would be one of those big mistakes to tell the states they have no authority to to fix what Congress didn't fix. Why should Congress listen to the companies that created the mess that Congress is trying to clean up on this matter anyway? Shouldn't Congress listen instead to the state Attorneys General who've been leaders in protecting consumers and who oppose this provision, too? Posted by Ed Mierzwinski
at 12:31 PM
| Comments
(0)
Tim Karr of SavetheInternet.com has a nice blog explaining the successful FCC hearing on the Internet held at Carnegie-Mellon University last night: Excerpt explaining the digital divide and need for expanded efforts to make broadband hookups available to everyone: Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 09:37 AM | Comments (0) July 21, 2008:
The New York Times editorial board just posted to its blog Can't We All Agree On This?: Toys Should Not Kill (Or Injure) Children. Excerpt: Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 04:24 PM | Comments (0) From today's earnings announcement from Bank of America: Kenneth D. Lewis, chairman and chief executive officer, said: "Outside of real estate-related products, our operating results were quite good [...] Record quarterly net revenue of $20.32 billion was driven by an expanded net interest yield, loan growth and higher income from service charges, mortgage banking and investment and brokerage services [...]Elsewhere in the release, BofA referred to those real-estate products as affected by "market disruptions." From Earnings Fall 44% at Bank of America by Eric Dash on the New York Times website: Continue reading "Offsetting "market disruptions," Bank of America buoyed by service charge income" Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 03:12 PM | Comments (0) The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals today threw out the FCC indecency fine totaling $550,000 ($27,500 levied by the FCC on each of 20 FCC-licensed CBS affiliates) over the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show featuring Janet Jackson's infamous "wardrobe malfunction" in the company of Justin Timberlake. Story from the New York Times. Excerpt from a statement supporting the court's action issued by Jonathan Rintels of the Center for Creative Voices In Media: Continue reading "Court rejects FCC fine for Janet Jackson "wardrobe malfunction"" Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 02:13 PM | Comments (0) July 19, 2008:
As she often does, Gretchen Morgenson of the New York Times has yet another story explaining how the banking system has gone awry, and now the economy itself is suffering. Her story in Sunday's paper explains how banks no longer merely earn money from reasonable interest, but instead have developed perpetual interest practices magnified by punitive fees to drive Americans deeper into debt. It's backfired as her story Given a Shovel, Digging Deeper Into Debt explains: Average late fees rose to $35 in 2007 from less than $13 in 1994, and fees charged when customers exceed their credit limits more than doubled to $26 a month from $11, according to CardWeb, an online publisher of information on payment and credit cards. Mortgage lenders similarly added or raised fees associated with borrowing to buy a home — like $75 e-mail charges, $100 document preparation costs and $70 courier fees — bringing the average to $700 a mortgage, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. These “junk fees” have risen 50 percent in recent years, said Michael A. Kratzer, president of FeeDisclosure.com, a Web site intended to help consumers reduce fees on mortgages. If you want to look to where this all started, look to unwise preemption of strong state consumer protection laws by federal agencies and lazy courts that failed to understand either the law or the implications of their lazy decisions, and look especially to the OCC (PIRG's OCCWatch) -- chief regulator of all national banks, as an enabler of these unfair practices. OCC will claim it was mortgage guys outside their regulatory sphere-- don't believe them. Their national banks were critical players. As Morgenson quotes: "Today the focus for lenders is not so much on consumer loans being repaid, but on the loan as a perpetual earning asset," said Julie L. Williams, chief counsel of the Comptroller of the Currency, in a March 2005 speech that received little notice at the time. Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 07:54 PM | Comments (0) From Professor Elizabeth Warren over at the Credit Slips blog (excerpt): A new academic paper, Bankruptcy Reform and Foreclosure, argues that the 2005 bankruptcy amendments are deepening the mortgage crisis. The article was written by David Bernstein, an economist at the U.S. Treasury who chose to post this analysis as private citizen listing only his home address and home e-mail address. Drawing on data from the Survey of Consumer Finance, he links credit card debt, access to bankruptcy, and mortgage foreclosures.Well, I guess if the credit card bankers "won" in 2005, and they did, against the views of every civil rights, consumer and labor organization, joined by independent economists and professors and the bankruptcy judges themselves, then Bernstein's paper is one more piece of evidence that consumers, homeowners, all banks and the economy all lost. Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 03:58 PM | Comments (0) July 18, 2008:
Business Week reporters Ben Elgin and Jessica Silver-Greenberg have posted their investigative story on the relationship between colleges and credit card companies: The College Credit-Card Hustle. It should appear on newsstands Monday. Excerpt: The growing financial alliance between schools and banks raises questions about whether universities are encouraging students to incur additional high-interest debt at a time when many young people graduate from college owing tens of thousands of dollars. Most undergraduates lack substantial income of their own and are especially vulnerable to late fees and other penalties if they fall behind on monthly payments. For more on our work in this area, and information on the fair marketing principles we are urging colleges to agree to, go to our website truthaboutcredit.org. Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at 03:51 PM | Comments (0) |
Categories Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 Recent Entries PIRG, coalition release: Total Recall: The Need for CPSC Reform Now New credit card survey from Consumer Action Clock ticking on CPSC bill FCC holds "Future of Internet" hearing in Pittsburgh New York Times editorial board for CPSC reform now Offsetting "market disruptions," Bank of America buoyed by service charge income Court rejects FCC fine for Janet Jackson "wardrobe malfunction" Morgenson: Owe my soul to the company store Paper says 2005 bankruptcy law making mortgage crisis worse BW: The College Credit-Card Hustle Consumer Project Archives |
||||
|
218
D. Street, SE Washington, DC 20003 |