logo

U.S. PIRG Consumer Blog

« Auto title pawn ripoffs | Main | Sony sued for dangerous CD software/spyware »

November 27, 2005

Unconscionable vs. arbitration at the US Supreme Court

On Tuesday, our colleague Paul Bland of Trial Lawyers for Public Justice will argue an important case, Buckeye vs. Cartegna, before the U.S. Supreme Court. Here's the brief Paul and co-counsel filed. Here's the amicus brief of Center for Responsible Lending, U.S. PIRG and National Association of Consumer Advocates. The case is an appeal by usurious payday lenders of a Florida Supreme Court ruling that consumers cannot be subjected to mandatory arbitration if the underlying contract is unconscionable and therefore illegal. The payday lenders' goal: preempt a strong state consumer law. Previous blog with more detail.

Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at November 27, 2005 06:03 PM


Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?



218 D. Street, SE Washington, DC 20003
Phone (202) 546-9707

E-mail: