|
U.S. PIRG Consumer Blog
« The great rebate debate |
Main
| Opponents of fairly-priced medicines go hard negative »
April 28, 2007
Groups oppose Baroody as CPSC nominee
We've joined leading consumer groups including Consumer Federation of America, Public Citizen and Consumers Union in official opposition to the President's nomination of Michael Baroody, the executive vice president of the National Association of Manufacturers, to chair the Consumer Product Safety Commission. (Our joint news release and white paper.) Baroody has long been a general in the war against consumer and worker safeguards. Putting him in charge of product safety is a classic fox in charge of the henhouse situation.
We take this nomination seriously. We only oppose nominees -- judicial or executive branch -- whose extreme positions and/or lack of qualifications go far beyond mere reflection of the President's views and the approval of the nominee would pose severe threats to consumers or the environment. MORE:
The CPSC is one of America's smallest, but most important safety agencies. It has jurisdiction over 15,000 different consumer products, from escalators to stoves to toys and other children's products. If defective, many of the products it regulates pose the threat of greatest harm to consumers least able to help themselves: children and the elderly. It is critical that the CPSC hold manufacturers of dangerous products accountable. Yet NAM, run on a day-to-day basis by its EVP Michael Baroody, has led the fight to over the years to keep the CPSC's budget low and to limit its power to recall or even conduct investigations of dangerous products. In such a difficult regulatory environment, only a chair willing to use all the limited regulatory tools at his or her disposal -- while also standing on a bully pulpit -- can hope to protect the public effectively.
Yet Baroody's lack of statutory qualifications as a safety expert and his history as an opponent of consumer laws suggest that he would instead likely move to dismantle the agency's already limited authority to protect consumers.
-- Baroody led NAM's unsuccessful opposition to NYPIRG's and fire fighter organizations' historic campaign to enact fire-safe cigarette legislation, now emulated by nearly ten states. That product safety legislation is expected to save hundreds of lives/year and billions of dollars/year in property damage reductions as it expands nationwide.
-- Baroody led NAM's successful opposition to Clinton-era worker safety ergonomics rules that had been backed by solid science.
-- NAM's CPSC Coalition -- comprised of companies under the agencies' jurisdiction, many of which have been fined for violations -- has successfully defeated efforts by Rep. Schakowsky (IL) and other champions to improve the CPSC's authority and increase its funding. NAM's Coalition recommends weakening the agency's powers further.
Simply, Baroody is the wrong person for the job of protecting the American public from unsafe products.
Posted by Ed Mierzwinski at April 28, 2007 09:23 AM
Post a comment
|