I read the public database provision of the bill, S. 2663, the CPSC Reform Act, as a carefully-crafted bi-partisan compromise that protects corporate secrets and corporate good names and also requires prompt removal of incorrect information. I read the NAM opposing view and I think they're basing their opinion on some other proposal. They've had a cozy secret relationship with the CPSC for many years and they like it. But if we had such a database of of information about complaints, maybe more would have been done about the Simplicity crib recall debacle featured in the USA Today board's viewpoint. And, yesterday, Shelby Esses, mother of 20-month- old Jack Esses, who went into a date-rape drug-induced coma for 5 hours after swallowing the toy called Aqua-Dots, spoke at a news conference with Senator Pryor, chief sponsor of S. 2663, at the U.S. Capitol about how she could find nothing on the CPSC website about the problem and any previous complaints.
As she said at a previous news event:
"If there had been a database we could have turned to that (and) had information about the product, it would have made treating it a lot easier and really put our minds at ease," she said.
Although there remain a lot of positive and negative amendments in the hopper, yet unconsidered, it appears that we're close to the finish line. Staff will work all night on negotiable amendments, and there will be some votes tomorrow on amendments where there was no consensus. Probably, there will be some amendment on weakening the public right-to-know database. It is likely that final passage will occur tomorrow (Thursday) night. But just to be sure, the Majority Leader, Harry Reid, filed a petition today to hold a cloture motion to limit debate on Friday morning.