U.S. PIRG Consumer Blog: Release on new Fed overdraft proposal

As part of their new credit card rules approved last week making certain unfair practices illegal, the regulators had also intended to finalize an additional -- quite weak -- rule regulating the lucrative "bounce protection" programs that banks have used to collect billions in overdraft fees. While the regulators did at the same time as they approved the credit card rules, withdraw their mediocre overdraft rule, what they ended up doing is weak also. We joined other leading groups in a news release explaining the problems with what the Fed ending up doing-- proposing two alternatives instead. The Fed's new proposal is based on two supposed alternatives. The first, an opt-out, is unacceptable; the second, an opt-in, is marginally acceptable, although the remainder of the new rule proposal simply fails to address all of the other inherent problems with overdraft loan programs. The Fed should have simply immediately required that no consumer could be enrolled automatically in one of these programs without an affirmative opt-in (e.g., without a comment period), and then proposed rules only to address the other problems with these bounce protection programs. Instead, the Fed proposed an opt-in to address some of the problems, but inanely asked for comment as to how it compared with an opt-out (duh) and ignored the myriad other problems with bounce protection in its proposal. How bad are overdraft programs? One study by our colleagues at the Center for Responsible Lending found that "the typical overdraft loan triggered by a debit card, incurring a $34 fee, is only $17." Excerpts from our joint news release explaining that:

For instance, the proposed rule does not require that consumers be provided with federal truth-in-lending disclosures about the APR of overdraft loans. A recent FDIC study noted that charging a $27 overdraft fee for a $20 debit card transaction would be the equivalent of a 3,520% APR if the overdraft is repaid in two weeks.

The proposed new rule is disappointing in other ways, also:

While the Fed proposed to prohibit most overdrafts caused solely by debit card “holds”—when a hold by a merchant exceeds the actual amount charged—it did not address check holds, when banks intentionally delay the availability of deposits, or banks’ ability to manipulate the order in which transactions are cleared in order to maximize overdrafts.

You can comment on the proposal at the Fed site here.